EXPERT VOICES

Timely insight on cancer topics from the experts of the American Cancer Society

American Cancer Society Expert Voices

The American Cancer Society

Will a vitamin a day keep cancer away?

August 16, 2011

By Marji McCullough, ScD, RD

 

Editor's note: Dr. McCullough added the following statement 12/20/13 in response to new studies being released:

Recent findings on multivitamin supplements published after the posting of this blog deserve mention. In 2012, the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a daily multivitamin supplement were published, showing a small but statistically significant lower risk of all cancers combined in male physicians followed over 11 years.  The supplement included 30 nutrients at levels similar to that found in a regular diet in the United States (≤100% recommended daily allowance (RDA)).  The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recently updated their review of vitamin and mineral supplements for the primary prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and found there isn't much evidence that multivitamins or supplements help prevent cancer or CVD. But they add that a small benefit from multivitamin supplements on cancer in men was found, based on this study and an earlier RCT in France. The study in France found lower rates of cancer in men, but not women. The authors speculate that this may have been due to worse nutritional status - a generally less nutritious diet in the men - but more research is needed. In the study with the male physicians mentioned above, they all were well nourished but still saw some benefit.

There are still questions to answer about multivitamins and cancer from the RCTs: why only in men? Does whether you have a nutritious diet matter, and to what degree? Are these findings able to be replicated? Longer follow-up from these trials (to see long term effects) may provide more clues. In the meantime, these studies show that lower-dose multivitamins (with ≤100% RDA) appear safe and don't raise risk of cancer or CVD. Still, the best way to get nutrients is through a healthy diet, and the cost of multivitamins can add up. People should discuss the pros and cons of supplement use with their health care professional.

 

Original blog, 8/16/2011


Can popping vitamin pills prevent cancer? The simple answer is no, based on what we know so far. In fact, some vitamin supplements have even shown harm. What I'm talking about mostly are pills containing individual nutrients in amounts that are greater than that found in food. Before you stop reading, thinking this is simply another "just eat your vegetables" message, let me give you a little history.


Toward the end of the last century, scientists observed that people with healthy diets, and with higher levels of certain phytochemicals ("phyto" for plant) in their bloodstream, such as beta-carotene, had lower rates of cancer. But observations don't prove cause and effect.


So, after careful evaluation of promising dietary compounds, the scientists began planning randomized, placebo controlled clinical trials ("RCTs") with tens of thousands of healthy people to see if taking supplements of individual phytochemicals could actually prevent cancer. RCTs are considered by most to be the gold standard for proving something works. Most of the supplements tested were antioxidants, which are chemical compounds that combat "free radicals" in the body that can damage DNA and possibly lead to cancer.


There was tremendous hope for the approach of preventing cancer by popping a vitamin pill.  And, the first large study testing a combination of vitamins in a nutritionally deficient Chinese population at high risk of gastrointestinal cancers showed promise. 


However, the results of almost every study since found that the people who were randomized to receive the supplement (rather than the placebo) did not get less cancer. In fact, in some studies, the people who got supplements actually got more cancer! Here's a quick summary of major findings:


RCTs that didn't pan out:


Beta-carotene:
 In two separate studies across the globe (here and here) smokers taking high doses of beta-carotene unexpectedly developed MORE lung cancer than those taking placebo. What went wrong? The beta-carotene doses found in normal diet (like in sweet potatoes, carrots, etc.) is much lower than the doses given in the studies. Other nutrients in plants that might work together with beta carotene to prevent cancer were not included in the supplements.

After the studies came out, researchers determined that in the lungs of smokers, the high doses of beta-carotene might have acted like a pro-oxidant (causing DNA damage) instead of an anti-oxidant. In two other studies of mostly non-smoking men and women, beta carotene didn't have an effect on cancer risk either way (here and here).   


Selenium:
  A trial of selenium and skin cancer found no protection for skin cancer, but it did suggest a lower risk of prostate cancer, which led to another large RCT. This second study, called SELECT, gave either selenium, vitamin E, both or placebo, to some 35,000 healthy men. It found no effect either way of selenium or vitamin E on prostate cancer.


Vitamin C
Several studies have found no association between vitamin C in preventing or causing cancers or heart disease.


Folate:
  Although folate is associated with a lower risk of developing colorectal (colon) cancer, a recent RCT showed that in people who have had polyps removed, high doses of folic acid slightly increased the number and size of new polyps.  What this suggests is that if the cancer process has already started, high dose supplements might feed the process.


Multivitamins:
 At least 50% of US adults take a vitamin supplement. The United States Preventive Task Force reviewed the evidence and concluded that taking multivitamins (in adults) will not reduce the risk of cancer or other chronic diseases. Multivitamins contain several of the nutrients discussed above, though usually in lower doses than the trials.    


To be determined


Vitamin D
:  Although some observational studies (here and here) provide some support for a role of vitamin D in colon cancer prevention, doses of 400 IU/day did not lower colon or breast cancer risk in a RCT. A new large trial testing vitamin D at higher doses (and fish oil) is enrolling participants now, so results won't be out for several years. Vitamin D is hotly debated, and experts are understandably guarded about recommending any supplements to lower cancer risk until the evidence is solid. We say "remember beta-carotene" the way historians say "remember the Alamo."


More Promising


Calcium:
  I've saved the best news for last. A large RCT in the United States showed that, in people who have had colorectal (colon) polyps removed, taking calcium lowers the risk that polyps will grow back by 15%. There is one hitch, though: men who consume or take high doses of calcium (say, >1,500 mg) may be at slightly higher risk of developing prostate cancer, according to some observational studies. For women, this is obviously not a problem. Until we know more, men may want to keep calcium intake between 800 mg and less than 1,500 mg. Supplements usually contain 500 mg, and a cup of milk contains 300 mg. 


It's worth noting that the Institute of Medicine, the organization that comes up with the recommended dietary intake levels that you see on food packages, also figures out what doses of vitamins might lead to toxicity. Out of approximately 30 food constituents reviewed, they've assigned an "upper tolerable limit" on about half of them. That means there's documented evidence that too much can be harmful for half of the best-studied nutrients. For less well-studied supplements, well, we know even less.


We all know that too much of a good thing is rarely good, yet somehow have it in our heads that 'more is better' when it comes to vitamin supplements.  I think that's because these nutrients are found in the foods your mom told you to eat more of. The catch is that supplements usually include isolated nutrients, often in much higher doses-and sometimes different chemical forms-- than that found in nature.


To wrap up, here are the important things to know:

1) Supplements are not the same as food. No supplement can fully replace a healthy diet.

2) More is not always better. Make sure to tell your health care provider about any supplements you are taking.

3) Supplements are not regulated by the FDA. That's right - no oversight. Given the fact that we know toxicities and overdoses can occur, and that some trials have shown harm from supplements, it's wise not to go overboard on supplements. 


The take-home message?  There may be other good reasons to take supplements, but at least for now, prevention of cancer is not one of them.


If you want to learn more about which vitamins are under study for cancer prevention, visit clinicaltrials.gov.


Dr. McCullough is strategic director of nutritional epidemiology at the American Cancer Society.

Comments

8/18/2011 11:03:49 PM #

parkbes


Thanks. valuable information indeed.  I read about  mega dose therapy of vitamin C so  
I began taking approx 10g of Vitamin C daily.
But this says Vitamin C has no association with cancers. I am a bit confused.
( any side effects of mega dose therapy ?   should I take less Vitamin C daily?)
Anyway its a great article that everyone should read !

parkbes

8/23/2011 1:38:14 PM #

admin

Hi, Parkbes, thanks for reading and for your comment and question. From Dr McCullough:

I'm glad you found the post useful. People tend to think that vitamin C is nontoxic, so it's often taken in large amounts.  In it's review of the scientific evidence on vitamin C and health, the Institute of Medicine set a Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) (the intake level that is sufficient to meet the nutrient requirement of nearly all healthy individuals in a particular age and gender group) for vitamin C of 90 mg/day for men and 75 mg /day for women.  There is little increase in blood levels at intakes above 200 mg/day.   The IOM also set a "Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL)" of 2,000 mg (or 2 g) for vitamin C.  This is the highest level of nutrient intake that is likely to pose no risk of adverse effects for almost all individuals in the general population.  The most substantiated side effects for intakes greater than 2 g are gastrointestinal disturbances but other concerns have also been raised.   It's a good idea to mention anything you're taking, including pills, supplements and vitamins, to your doctor.  

admin

8/23/2011 1:58:52 PM #

admin

Parkbes, also, in terms of your daily Vit C dose, Dr McCullough says: "The dose you are taking is well above that.  I'd recommend staying closer to the RDA and at least under the UL."

Thanks again!

admin

8/23/2011 8:27:45 PM #

parkbes


Thank you for your recommendation.
I will  try to take  less than 2000~3000mg  Vitamin C  a day under the UL.

Thanks Doctor.

parkbes

8/26/2011 11:38:32 AM #

Ann

Thank you for the valuable insights. Since the Society speaks so clearly about prevention of certain behaviors in terms of diseases other than cancer, it would be great to hear more about vitamins in relationship to other health issues such as heart disease. I ready an article recently on the overdose of calcium and the effect on heart disease risk. Thanks again. Ann  

Ann

10/18/2011 6:08:12 AM #

Barbara

[comment deleted due to blog comment policy]

Barbara

10/5/2012 3:52:50 PM #

Michael

I can't believe you do not  talk about Cesium Chloride as a treatment. You are obviously controlled by the pharmaceuticals.
I will make it my duty to tell everyone that their donations are not going to the best cancer research entity. I call on you to recognize my right to freedom of speech and post this comment. or, which what I would like you to do, is explain your research using Cesium Chloride to clear-up any question about  your research findings.

Michael

3/24/2013 9:52:20 PM #

David Bell

Google cesium chloride and American Cancer Society. You will see it is mentioned.

David Bell

8/20/2013 2:06:42 PM #

pauline jensen

I'm surprised that you didn't list curcumin as one of the "more promising" supplements to take since that has a much more established research history.

pauline jensen

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



About the Blog

Expert Voices will give you more than the statistics: it will give you insight. More