Home | Community | Get Involved | Donate | | Site Index | Search Go Button
The mark, American Cancer Society, is a registered trademark of the American Cancer Society, Inc., and may not be copied, reproduced, transmitted, displayed, performed, distributed, sublicensed, altered, stored for subsequent use or otherwise used in whole or in part in any manner without ACS's prior written consent.
 
My Planner Register | Sign In Sign In


Making Treatment Decisions
 
    Types of Treatment
    Clinical Trials
    NCCN Treatment Guidelines for Patients
    Treatment Decision Tools
    Choosing Treatment Facilities and Health Professionals
    Find Treatment Centers
    Nutrition for Cancer Patients
    Staying Active During Treatment
    Complementary & Alternative Therapies
    Guide to Cancer Drugs
    Talking About Cancer
    Message Boards
Glossary
    I Want to Help
  Help in the fight against cancer. Donate and volunteer. It's easy and fun!
  Learn more
   
Clinical Trials: What You Need to Know

Introduction
Why Do We Need to Conduct Clinical Trials?
What Are Preclinical Studies And Clinical Trials?
What Are the Phases of Clinical Trials?
Who Sponsors Clinical Trials? Who Conducts Them?
Should I Think About Taking Part in a Clinical Trial?
Who Will Look Out for Me as a Participant?
What's Out There? Finding Clinical Trials
How Do I Figure Out Which Study Is for Me?
What About Cost? Will My Insurance Cover It?
What Would Participating Involve for Me?
What If I'm Not Eligible for a Clinical Trial?
References


Introduction

Choosing whether or not to take part in a clinical trial can be one of the toughest decisions facing a person with cancer.

Clinical trials are people-based studies -- as opposed to animal or lab studies -- of new drugs or procedures. Doctors use clinical trials to learn whether a new treatment is safe and effective in patients. Such studies are vital to the development of new treatments for diseases such as cancer.

The doctors in charge of a clinical trial don’t know ahead of time how things will turn out. If they did, there would be no need for the study in the first place. Because of this, there’s no simple answer to the question, "Should I take part?"

Most people don’t pay much attention to clinical trials until they are diagnosed with a serious illness such as cancer. Medical breakthroughs (the results of clinical trials) often make the news, but you usually don’t hear about clinical trials themselves unless something has gone wrong in a clinical trial. The media is quick to pick up on an instance when a volunteer in a study is harmed. While it is very rare, people have been harmed, and have even died, while taking part in clinical trials. Reports of these tragic outcomes are important, because they help to expose problems in the system, which are then corrected to protect others.

What you usually don’t hear about, however, are the thousands of people who are helped each year because they decided to take part in a clinical trial, not to mention the millions who ultimately benefit from others’ participation in clinical trials.

There is no right or wrong choice when it comes time to decide on taking part in a clinical trial. The decision is a very personal one and depends on many factors, including the benefits and risks of the study, what the person hopes to achieve by taking part, and other preferences.

Knowing all you can about clinical trials in general -- and ones you are considering in particular -- can help you feel more at ease with your decision. If you do decide to participate, knowing what to look for and what to expect ahead of time can help you.

This guide should address many basic questions and concerns so that you are better prepared to discuss the subject with your doctor and family. It should clarify which questions need to be asked beforehand and what the answers may mean for you. In the end, however, only you can decide if taking part in a clinical trial is right for you.

One last note: this guide focuses on studies for people who are being treated for cancer. But most of the information here applies to other types of clinical trials as well.


Return to Top of Page


Why Do We Need to Conduct Clinical Trials?

Clinical trials show us what works (and what doesn’t) in medicine. They are the best way for doctors to learn what is safe and effective in treating diseases such as cancer.

Some doctors and scientists conducted what would now be considered clinical trials as far back as the late 1700s, but clinical trials were not widely used until the middle of the 20th century. Up until that time, doctors relied on their own experience in particular cases and on the teachings of those who came before them. Progress was slow, and very few medicines existed that could even be tested.

With the discovery of the first antibiotics and other drugs, doctors needed a reliable way to tell what worked from what didn’t. They also needed ways to find out which of the countless remedies available at that time were safe for people to use. So they developed studies that tested, and often compared, treatments in a specific group of people. The results of these clinical trials proved to be more useful than relying on whether or not something worked in one or a few people.

In the US, new drugs and medical devices (but not dietary supplements) must be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can be advertised or sold to the general public. The FDA began overseeing the safety of new treatments in the late 1930s but didn’t require proof of effectiveness until the early 1960s. Today, drugs and medical devices must go through several phases of clinical trials (discussed below) before being approved for use.

Based on what we have learned about cancer in recent years, researchers can now develop new treatments in a more logical way and much faster than in the past. But it's still a time-consuming and difficult process.

Clinical trials are only a small part of the research that goes into developing a new treatment. Potential drugs, for example, first have to be discovered, purified, characterized, and tested in labs (in cell and animal studies) before ever reaching clinical trials. In all, about 1,000 potential drugs are tested before just one reaches the point of being tested in a clinical trial. On average, a new cancer drug has at least 6 years of research behind it before it even makes it to clinical trials. But the major holdup in making new cancer drugs available is the time it takes to complete clinical trials themselves. On average, about 8 years pass from the time a cancer drug enters clinical trials until it is approved.

Why so long? To establish safety and effectiveness, researchers look at each new treatment in several different studies. Only certain people are eligible to take part in each clinical trial. And cancer trials, by their very nature, take years to complete. It takes months, if not years, to see if a cancer treatment works in any one person.

The biggest barrier to completing studies is the shortage of people who take part. Fewer than 5% of adults with cancer will do so. According to the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), about 400 cancer medicines were being tested in clinical trials in 2005. Not all of these will prove to be useful, but those that are may be delayed in getting approved because the number of participants is so low.

The number one reason people give for not taking part in a clinical trial is that they didn’t know the studies were an option for them. But there are many other reasons. Some people may want to take part but aren’t eligible for some reason. Some people are uncomfortable with the idea of being a "subject" in a study. Others worry that they won’t be treated fairly or could be harmed by an unproven treatment. Certainly these are understandable concerns.

One of the most important points in deciding if a clinical trial can be done is whether or not it would be ethical to ask patients to volunteer for an experimental treatment. Has the study been designed, as much as possible, to ensure the safety of the people involved? Would the participants receive a treatment that is at least as good as, and possibly better than, what they would get if they did not volunteer for the study? Scientific panels are set up to review and approve all clinical trials to make sure questions like these are answered before the researchers are allowed to enroll patients.

Return to Top of Page


What Are Preclinical Studies and Clinical Trials?

Clinical trials are medical research studies involving people. They are done only after "preclinical" studies suggest that the proposed treatment is likely to be safe and effective in people.

Preclinical studies, also called laboratory studies, include:

  • Cell studies: These are often the first tests done when looking at a new form of treatment. To see if it is effective, researchers look for effects of the new treatment on cancer cells on a laboratory dish or in a test tube.
  • Animal studies: Treatments that appear promising in cell studies are next tested on tumors in lab animals. This gives the researchers an idea of how safe the new treatment is in a living organism.
Although preclinical studies provide a lot of useful information, they do not give us all the answers. After all, humans and mice are different. A treatment that works against cancer in a mouse may or may not work in people. And human bodies sometimes process drugs differently. This may result in side effects that were not obvious when studying the treatment in mice.

Clinical trials are therefore needed to answer 2 important questions:

  • Is the new treatment effective? Is it better than what’s now available to treat a specific disease? If it’s not better, is it at least as good, perhaps while causing fewer side effects? Or does it work in some people who don't benefit from current treatments? In other words, is it a step forward? A treatment that doesn’t offer anything new probably isn’t worth studying.
  • Is the new treatment safe? This must be answered while realizing that no treatment or procedure—even one already in use—is entirely without risk. But do the benefits of the new treatment outweigh the possible risks?

Answering these questions, while exposing as few people as possible to an unknown treatment, often requires several different clinical trials. These are usually divided into "phases." Each phase is designed to answer certain questions, while trying to ensure the safety of the people taking part. Each new treatment is tested in several phases of clinical trials before being considered reasonably safe and effective. These phases are discussed in the next section.

Some Important Points to Keep in Mind

Clinical trials are vital in studying all aspects of medicine, not just cancer. The stakes may seem higher when researching medicines to treat cancer, but all new treatments (drugs and medical devices) must go through clinical trials before being approved by the FDA for general use.

When most people think about clinical trials, they have certain ideas about what they involve. But not all clinical trials are the same.

Not all clinical trials study treatments. Many clinical trials study new ways to detect, diagnose, or determine the extent of disease. Some even look at ways to prevent the disease from happening in the first place.

Even among clinical trials that do study treatments, not all of them study drugs. Many clinical trials test other forms of treatment, such as new surgery or radiation therapy techniques, or even complementary or alternative medicines.

When clinical trials do look at drugs, not all of them study new ones. Even after a drug has been approved for use against a type of cancer, doctors sometimes find it works better when given a certain way or when combined with other treatments. It may even work on a different kind of cancer. Clinical trials are needed to study these possibilities as well.

Very few cancer clinical trials involve a placebo. A placebo is an inactive ingredient or pill used in some types of clinical trials to help make sure results are unbiased. A placebo is sometimes called a "sugar pill." Over the years, doctors have observed that some people begin to feel better even if they just think they’re being treated. With the possibility of getting a placebo, people can’t tell whether they are receiving the treatment being studied or not, which makes the results more likely to be valid.

Placebos are rarely used alone in cancer research, unless no known effective treatments exist. It’s certainly not ethical to have someone take a placebo if an effective standard treatment is already available. When cancer clinical trials compare treatments, they compare the new treatment against the current standard treatment. At times, a study may be designed so that patients may not be told which one they are receiving, but they know they are at least getting the current standard of care.

In some clinical trials, the doctors want to learn whether adding a new drug to the standard therapy improves its effectiveness. In these studies, some patients receive the standard drug(s) and a new one, while other patients receive the standard drug(s) and a placebo. But none of the patients would receive a placebo only. Everyone receives standard treatment if there is a standard treatment available. (See "What Are the Phases of Clinical Trials?" for an example of a phase III study involving a placebo.)

All clinical trials are voluntary. You always have the right to choose whether or not you will take part in a clinical trial. The level of care you receive should not be affected by your decision. And you have the right to leave a clinical trial at any time, for any reason. If you decide to leave, your health care team may ask that you continue to be monitored for a period of time to look for any long-term effects of treatment. We discuss these issues further in the section "What Would Participating Involve for Me?"

Return to Top of Page


What Are the Phases of Clinical Trials?

Clinical trials are usually conducted in distinct phases. Each one is designed to answer specific questions. Knowing the phase of the clinical trial you are considering is important because it may give you some idea about how much is known about the treatment being studied. There are advantages and disadvantages to taking part in each phase of clinical trial.

Phase I Clinical Trials – Is the Treatment Safe?

These studies are the first ones to involve people as participants. Although the treatment has been tested in lab and animal studies, the side effects in people can’t always be predicted. For this reason, these studies usually include small numbers of people (15 to 50) and are generally reserved for those who do not have good treatment options left to them. Often, people with different types of cancer are eligible for the same study. These studies are usually done in major cancer centers.

The main reasons for doing phase I studies are to determine the highest dose of the new treatment that can be given safely (without serious side effects) and to decide on the best way to give the new treatment. The first few people in the study often receive a low dose of the treatment and are then watched very closely. If there are no or only minor side effects, the next few patients receive a higher dose. This process continues until doctors find the dose that is most likely to work while having an acceptable level of side effects.

Safety is the main concern because it is the first time the treatment has been used in people. Doctors keep a close eye on how the people in the study are doing. Special tests, such as blood tests to measure levels of the drug in the body at certain time points, are often a part of these trials. Some studies may require time in a hospital. Placebos (inactive pills or ingredients) are not part of phase I trials.

These studies are not designed to look at how effective the new treatment is. Overall, these trials are the ones with the most potential risk and the least likelihood of potential benefit. But they do help some patients. For those with life-threatening illnesses, weighing the potential risks and benefits carefully is crucial.

Here’s an example of a typical phase I clinical trial, but keep in mind that each study is slightly different:

Bruce was diagnosed with cancer 4 years ago. He was first treated with radiation therapy, but the cancer was later found to have spread to distant parts of his body. His doctor told him two chemotherapy drugs, “A” and “B,” might help him. Bruce’s cancer shrank for a short time while he was taking drug A, but then it began to grow again. Drug B did not work in his case.

Because Bruce is still relatively young, his doctor suggests he might want to consider trying a new form of treatment, “EXP1,” which is being studied in a phase I clinical trial at the nearest university hospital.

Bruce talks with the university doctor conducting the study. The doctor explains that the drug being studied showed some promise in lab tests, but exactly how well it will work in people is still unknown. What’s more, it may have side effects that haven’t been seen yet. After getting all of his questions answered and weighing his options, Bruce decides to take part in the study.

Because 3 people have already enrolled in the study and have had no major side effects, Bruce will be the first to get a higher dose of the treatment. He will need to stay in the hospital overnight on the first night. This is both to watch for any unexpected reactions and to take blood samples every few hours so that doctors can figure out how long the treatment stays in his body. He will be allowed to go home the next day but must return regularly over the next few weeks to be monitored, until it is time for the next treatment.

Phase II Clinical Trials – Does It Work?

If a new treatment is found to be reasonably safe in phase I clinical trials, the treatment can then be tested for effectiveness in a phase II clinical trial.

Usually, a group of anywhere from 25 to 100 patients with the same type of cancer receive the new treatment in a phase II study. They are treated using the dose and method that were determined most likely to be safe and effective in phase I studies. In a typical phase II clinical trial, participants all receive the same dose, and no placebo is involved.

Some phase II studies do, however, involve randomizing participants into 1 of 2 treatment groups, similar to what is done in phase III trials (see below). These groups may get different doses or get the treatment in different ways to see which provides the best balance of safety and effectiveness. Phase II studies are often conducted at major cancer centers but may also be done in community hospitals or even doctors’ offices.

Doctors look for some evidence that the treatment is effective. The type of benefit they look for depends on the goals of the clinical trial. This may involve a response (where the tumor shrinks or disappears). Or it may be an extended period of time where the tumor does not get any bigger or an increase in the length of time before a cancer comes back. In some studies the benefit may be an improved quality of life. Many studies look to see if people getting the new treatment live longer than they would have been expected to without the treatment.

If a certain percentage of the patients benefit from the treatment (and the side effects aren’t too severe), it is considered to be active enough against that type of cancer to allow it to go on to a phase III clinical trial. In addition to watching for responses, doctors continue to look for any side effects. Larger numbers of patients receive the treatment in phase II studies, so there is a better chance that less common side effects may be seen.

Here’s an example of a phase II clinical trial. Again, some phase II studies may be slightly different:


Angela was diagnosed with cancer several months ago. Only one form of treatment, drug “C,” is known to work for people with her type of cancer, and it only works in about half of the people who try it. After several months of this treatment, Angela’s doctor told her that it did not appear to be helping in her case.

After doing a little research online, Angela and her doctor decide her best bet may be to enroll in a clinical trial. They find a phase II study being conducted by a doctor nearby, who is testing a new type of medicine, called “EXP2.” This medicine was already found to be safe in phase I studies. Although not many people have tried it, a couple of people with Angela’s type of cancer were helped by it.

Angela, like all of the other people in this study, will receive EXP2 once a week as an outpatient at a local hospital. Before receiving the drug each week, she will have physical examinations and blood tests done to see how her body is reacting to the medicine. She will also have scans done after several weeks to see if the drug is affecting the cancer. She had similar tests while receiving drug C, but this time the tests and exams are a little more frequent. Also, her doctor asks more specific questions about the side effects she experiences.

Phase III Clinical Trials – Is It Better Than What’s Already Available?

Treatments that show a certain level of effectiveness in phase II studies usually must go through one more stage of testing before being approved for general use. Phase III clinical trials compare the safety and effectiveness of the new treatment against the current standard treatment.

Phase III clinical trials require a large number of patients, usually at least several hundred. These studies are generally conducted in many places across the country (or even across the world) at the same time.

Because doctors do not yet know which treatment is better, patients are often randomized (chosen at random, like flipping a coin) to receive either the standard treatment or the new treatment. When possible, the study is double-blinded. That is, neither the doctor nor the patient knows which of the treatments the patient is getting. Randomization and blinding are discussed in more detail below.

As with other studies, patients in phase III clinical trials are watched closely for side effects, and treatment is stopped if they are too severe. Placebos may be used in some phase III studies, but they are never used alone if there is already a treatment available that may work.

Here’s an example of a phase III clinical trial that could possibly involve a placebo:

Joe has just been diagnosed with cancer. His surgeon was able to remove the tumor, but tells Joe that this form of cancer returns in about one-third of people. For this reason, doctors usually recommend giving a short course of chemotherapy drug "D." While this is the best drug available for reducing the likelihood of recurrence, some cancers still return. 

Joe’s doctor tells him that a new type of therapy, called "EXP3," is now being studied. EXP3 was designed to be given along with drug D. Earlier studies in animals and people have shown that the combination of drug D and EXP3 seems to be safe and effective. But it is not yet known if this combination will be better than the current standard of drug D alone in reducing the risk of recurrence. Therefore, doctors are testing it in a phase III clinical trial.
 
To do this, they’ve designed a study that involves treating people with this cancer in 1 of 2 groups (that is, there are 2 "arms" of the study): one group will get drug D plus EXP3, while the other group will get drug D plus a placebo. The patients will be blinded as to which arm they are on -- that is, they will not know whether they are getting EXP3 or the placebo. But all of the patients will be getting drug D, which is the accepted standard of care. The people who get EXP3 may do better than those who get the placebo. On the other hand, they may do worse because of things such as unknown side effects. Or both groups may do equally well, in which case EXP3 would not be any better than a placebo.

Joe, in deciding whether to take part in the clinical trial, needs to understand that he will be randomized to 1 of the 2 treatment arms, and neither he nor his doctor will have control over this. He also needs to understand that while on this study, he will not know which arm he has been assigned to (whether he is getting EXP3 or a placebo).
Randomization and blinding are used in many phase III studies because they help make the study results more credible.

When possible, participants are randomized to ensure that the two 2 study groups have the same traits -- for example, to make sure that they both contain people in similar states of health, so the results are not skewed in favor of one group. If people who were allowed to choose which treatment they got, the study results might not be as accurate. For example, people who were sicker might tend to choose one treatment over the other. If this treatment was then found not to work as well, doctors couldn’t be sure if this was because the treatment wasn’t as good or because it was tested in sicker people.

Often people have a 50:50 chance of ending up in one group or the other. In some cases, the study may allow for a different ratio, such as 2 out of /3 of the people receiving the new treatment and only 1 out of /3 getting the standard treatment.

Some people find the concept of randomized studies to be distressing, since neither the patient nor the doctor can choose which group the patient falls into. This can be especially true if a study is looking at two totally different treatments, and a person sees one as possibly better than the other. But remember, doctors are conducting doing the study because they really don’t know which one is better. Unfortunately, taking part in such a study is sometimes the only way a person may have a chance of getting a new form of treatment. But even then, that treatment may or may not be the best one for him or her.

Blinding is another area of concern for some people. In a blinded study, the patient doesn’t know which treatment he or she is getting. In a double-blinded study, neither the patient nor the doctor knows which treatment is used. Not knowing what you are receiving can be difficult. Your doctor can always find out which group you are in if medically necessary (such as during a possible drug reaction), but although it may result in your being removed from the study.

The possibility of receiving a placebo can also be upsetting to some. But this very rarely means you would get no treatment, unless there was no effective standard treatment to compare the new drug to. Again, in the example above, Joe will definitely get drug D, but he will also get either EXP3 or a placebo.

Submission for FDA Approval

In the United States, when clinical trials show a new treatment to be more effective and/or safer than the current standard treatment, it is submitted for approval to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA then takes several months to review the data.

Based on the results of the clinical trials, the FDA decides whether or not it is appropriate for use in the general public. When this happens, the treatment often becomes the new standard of care, and newer drugs must be tested against it before being approved.

Phase IV Clinical Trials – What Else Do We Need to Know?

Even after testing a new medicine on thousands of patients, the full effects of the treatment may not be known, and some questions may still need to be answered. For example, a drug may get FDA approval based on the fact that it was shown to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. But does this mean that those who get it are more likely to live longer? Are there rare side effects that haven’t been seen yet, or side effects that only show up after the drug is used for a long time? These types of questions may take many years to answer fully, and may not be critical for getting a medicine to market. They are often addressed in what are known as “phase IV” clinical trials.

Phase IV studies look at drugs that have already received FDA approval. Therefore they are already available for doctors to give to patients. But these studies are still needed to answer important questions.

When considering taking part in a phase IV trial, patients should know that the drug has already been approved for use. They do not need to enroll in the study to get the medicine. At the same time, the care they would receive in these types of studies is often very similar to what they could expect if they were to get the treatment outside of a clinical trial. They should be reassured that in participating they would be receiving a form of treatment that has already been studied extensively and that they would be doing a service to future patients.

Return to Top of Page


Who Sponsors Clinical Trials? Who Conducts Them?

Of the thousands of cancer clinical trials going on at any one time, the US National Cancer Institute (NCI), a part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), sponsors (pays for the costs of) a good portion of them. These studies are often run by NCI-sponsored cancer cooperative groups, which are networks of doctors and institutions across the country who specialize in a particular aspect of cancer.

In the Unites States, there are currently 10 major cooperative groups conducting studies:

  • American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN)
  • American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG)
  • Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)
  • Children's Oncology Group (COG)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)
  • Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)
  • National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)
  • North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG)
  • Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)
  • Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)

Other government agencies, including parts of the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense, also sponsor some cancer clinical trials.

The other main sponsors of clinical trials are pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, which must prove their medicines are safe and effective before they can be marketed. Some nonprofit organizations also sponsor clinical trials.

Researchers conduct clinical trials in many different settings. Major cancer centers are often the focal points of clinical trials research. Because they usually have the most advanced facilities and highly trained staffs, they can conduct all phases of clinical trials. But they are not the only places where these studies take place.

Community hospitals across the country also participate in clinical trials, although these are usually phase II or III studies. Many of these hospitals are part of the NCI’s Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP). CCOP members conduct the same clinical trials across the country. Community hospitals may conduct other, privately sponsored, studies as well.

Doctors in private practice can also be involved in clinical trials, either as members of cooperative groups or by being actively involved in privately sponsored research. But many doctors decide not to conduct clinical research, for a variety of reasons.

What This May Mean for You

At one time, clinical trials were done only at major medical centers. This often meant that patients had to travel long distances and were treated by doctors they did not know very well. This is sometimes still the case, especially with phase I and some phase II studies. Of course, this is not necessarily a bad thing. Many people prefer to be treated in major cancer centers because of their experience, reputation, and resources. Ultimately, the hassles of traveling must be weighed against the chance of benefiting from the treatment.

Patients now have more options. This may include staying closer to home during a study or even staying with their own doctor. Your doctor may or may not be involved in clinical trials. If he or she is, you may be eligible for one of them. Whether this is the right study for you is, of course, a question worth asking.

Although clinical trials are now done in many different settings, this should not affect the quality of care you receive. No matter where a study is conducted, the same rules are in place to protect patients.

Having so many options can be a burden in and of itself. With the thousands of clinical trials underway across the country, how can you—or even your doctor—decide which one is best for you? At this time, there is no complete list of all the cancer clinical trials. There are, however, several good places to start looking if you’re interested. We’ll explore these in the section "What's Out There? Finding Clinical Trials".

Return to Top of Page


Should I Think About Taking Part in a Clinical Trial?

This is one of the toughest questions many people with cancer will face. The same answer won’t be right for everyone. When trying to decide, first ask yourself some basic questions:

  • Why do I want to take part in a clinical trial?
  • What are my goals and expectations if I decide to participate? How realistic are these?
  • How sure are my doctors about what my future holds if:
    • I decide to participate?
    • I decide not to participate?
  • Have I considered:
    • The chance of benefit vs. risk?
    • Other possible factors, such as time and money?
    • My other possible options?

Some of these questions may not have clear-cut answers, but they should help you start thinking about some important issues. Each person’s situation is unique, and each person’s reasons for wanting or not wanting to take part in a study may be different.

Risk vs. Benefit

Each clinical trial offers its own opportunities and risks, but most have some things in common. 

Generally, clinical trials have some of the same potential benefits:

  • You may help others who have the same condition in the future by contributing to cancer research.
  • You may have access to treatment that is not otherwise available, which might be safer or more effective than current treatment options.
  • You may increase the total number of treatment options available to you, even if you haven’t yet received all of the standard treatments.
  • You may feel you have more control over your situation and are taking a more active role in your health care.
  • You will likely receive more attention from your health care team and more careful monitoring of your condition and the possible side effects of treatment.
  • Some study sponsors may pay for part or all of your medical care and other expenses during the study. This is not true for all clinical trials. Be sure you know who is expected to pay for your care before you enroll in the study.

Some of the potential downsides of being in a study can include the following:

  • The new treatment may have unknown side effects or other risks, which may or may not be more severe than those from existing treatments. This is especially true of early phase trials.
  • As with other forms of therapy, the new treatment may not work for you, even if it helps others.
  • There may be inconveniences such as more frequent testing, as well as time and travel commitments.
  • If you take part in a randomized clinical trial, you may not have a choice about which treatment you receive. If the study is blinded, you (and possibly your doctor) will not know which one you are getting (although this information is available if needed). This will be explained to you before you decide to take part.
  • Insurers may not cover all of the costs of taking part in a clinical trial (although they usually cover the costs for what would normally be standard care). Be sure to talk to your insurance provider and to someone involved with the study before you decide to take part, so you know what you may have to pay for.

Answers to Some Common Questions About Clinical Trials

Most people have some concerns about taking part in a clinical trial, often because they’re not really sure about what it involves. Gathering as much information as possible beforehand is the best way to ensure that you will make the choice that is right for you.

Will there be risks?

Yes, risks are involved in clinical trials. By the same token, risks are a part of any medical test, drug, or procedure. The risk may be greater in a clinical trial because some aspects of any new treatment are unknown. This is especially true of earlier phase clinical trials, where the treatment has been studied in fewer people.

Perhaps a more important question is whether the risks are outweighed by the possible benefits. People with cancer are often willing to accept a certain amount of risk for a chance to be helped, but it is always important to have a realistic idea about what this chance is. Ask your doctor if he or she can give you a reasonable idea of what the chance of benefit is, and exactly what this benefit is likely to be in your case.

With this in mind, you can make a more informed decision -- one that is right for you. Some people may decide that any chance of being helped is worth the risk, while others may not.

Will I be a “guinea pig”?

There’s no denying that the ultimate purpose of a clinical trial is to answer a medical question. People who take part in clinical trials may need to do certain things or have certain tests done to stay in the study.

But this does not mean that you will not receive excellent, compassionate care while in the study. In fact, most people enrolled in clinical trials appreciate the extra attention they receive from their health care team. In 2005, the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups surveyed over 1,700 people with cancer concerning their awareness and attitudes about clinical trials. Only a small portion took part in clinical trials. But most of those who did were very satisfied: 96% said they were treated with dignity and respect, 92% said they had a positive experience, and 91% would recommend that family or friends take part in a clinical trial if faced with cancer.

Will I get a placebo?

The vast majority of cancer clinical trials do not involve a placebo unless it's in combination with another, active, drug. It would be unethical to give someone an inactive medicine if it would deny him or her the chance to get one that has already been shown to work.

Unfortunately with cancer, there are some situations in which no effective treatments are known. In rare cases, testing a new treatment against a placebo might be needed to prove that the treatment is better than nothing at all.

The very least you should expect from any clinical trial is to be offered the standard of care already in use. (See the section "What Are the Phases of Clinical Trials?" for an example of a phase III study involving a placebo.)

Will my information be kept confidential?To the extent possible, all of your personal and medical information is kept confidential. Of course, your health care team needs to have access to this information to provide you with the best possible care, just as they would if you were not a clinical trial.

Medical information that is important for the study, such as test results, is usually transcribed onto special forms, which are then given to the people analyzing the study results. Your information is assigned a specific number or code - your name does not appear on the forms. Occasionally, some members from the research team or from the FDA may need to look at your medical records to verify the information they were given is correct. But your personal information is not submitted to them and is not used in any publications of study results.

Other Questions You Should Ask Your Research Team

Each clinical trial is unique, with its own potential benefits and risks. Before you decide to take part in a clinical trial, make sure you have answers to the following questions:

  • Why is this study being done?
  • What is likely to happen in my case if I decide to take part or decide not to take part in the study?
  • What are my other options (standard treatments, other studies)? What are their advantages and disadvantages?
  • How much experience do you have with this particular treatment? With clinical trials in general?
  • What were the results in previous studies of this treatment? How likely are they to apply to me?
  • What kinds of treatments and tests would I need to have on this study? How often are they done?
  • Will this require an extra time or travel commitment on my part?  
  • How could the study affect my daily life?
  • What side effects might I expect from the study? (Remember that there can also be side effects from standard treatments and from the disease itself.)
  • Will I have to be in the hospital for any parts of the study? If so, how often and for how long?
  • Will I still be seeing my regular doctor?
  • Will I have any costs? Will any of the treatment be free? Will my insurance cover the rest?
  • If I am harmed as a result of the research, what treatment will I be entitled to?
  • How long will I remain in the study?
  • Are there reasons I would be removed from the study? Are there reasons the study might be stopped early?
  • Is long-term follow-up care part of the study? What would it involve?
  • If the treatment is working for me, can I choose to continue getting it even after the study ends?
  • Are there others already taking part in the study whom I could speak to?
  • Will I be able to find out about the results of the study?

Involving trusted friends and family members may be a good idea. They can help reassure you that you’re making a decision that’s right for you. In addition, getting a second opinion from a doctor who is not associated with the study can give you a broader sense of whether this particular study is the best one to consider.

Return to Top of Page


Who Will Look Out for Me as a Study Participant?

Several levels of safeguards are in place to help protect the welfare of people who take part in clinical trials. There are still risks involved with any study, but these safeguards try to reduce the risk as much as possible.

Three basic principles, as outlined in the Belmont Report from the late 1970s, provide the basis for research involving humans:

  • Respect for persons: Recognizing that all people should be respected and have the right to choose what treatments they receive
  • Beneficence: Protecting people from harm by maximizing benefits and minimizing risks
  • Justice: Trying to ensure that all people share the benefits and burdens of research equally

These principles are upheld by individuals and groups at the sites conducting research and by government agencies charged with overseeing clinical trials. A very important part of patient protection is the informed consent process, which is described in detail in the section "What Would Participating Involve for Me?"

Safeguards in Institutions

Centers conducting clinical trials have committees that review all potential and ongoing clinical trials to protect the safety of those in the study. These are required for all federally funded clinical trials, but even privately sponsored studies typically undergo such reviews.

Institutional review boards (IRBs): IRBs are groups of people responsible for protecting the welfare of study participants and making sure that studies comply with federal laws. They are often made up of medical experts (doctors, nurses), other scientists, and non-medical people. Not all of the people on the IRB can come from only one of these groups. (In other words, an IRB couldn’t be composed of just doctors.) Many institutions have their own IRBs, although some smaller centers may use larger, "central" IRBs. The federal Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP; see below) oversees the activities of IRBs.

Researchers wanting to start a study must first submit the study protocol (the plan describing the study in detail) to the IRB for review. The IRB must decide if the study would be acceptable on medical, ethical, and legal grounds. In other words, is the study addressing a worthwhile question, and is it doing so in a way that ensures the safety of those talking part as much as possible? One of the most important functions of an IRB is to make sure the informed consent form that people entering the study must sign is accurate, complete, and easy to understand. Once a study begins, the IRB also follows its progress on a regular basis to look for potential problems.

If you take part in a clinical trial, you can contact the study’s IRB directly with any questions or concerns regarding safety.

Data safety monitoring boards (DSMBs):  DSMBs are used for phase III (and some earlier phase) studies. They are committees comprised of doctors and other scientists not involved in the study. Their job is to look at study statistics. They monitor the results of the clinical trial at different time points and can stop a study early (before all of the intended participants have been enrolled or completed the study) if:

  • it becomes clear that the new treatment is much more (or much less) effective, so as to allow all study participants to get the better treatment
  • safety concerns arise (such as risks of the new treatment clearly outweighing the benefits), so that no more people are exposed to possible harm

The principal investigator (PI): The PI is the doctor who is in charge of all aspects of a particular study. Ultimately, the responsibility for patient safety in a clinical trial lies with the PI. Part of this responsibility is letting the study sponsor know right away when serious side effects occur.

PIs generally have years of experience in running clinical trials. They are required to submit their credentials to the FDA before being allowed to run any study.

Government Agencies

Several government agencies play roles in ensuring that all research is conducted with patient safety in mind. These include:

Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP): The OHRP is the government’s main guardian of people’s safety and welfare in clinical trials. It was established in 2000 to coordinate efforts to protect all people involved in federally funded research. It enforces regulations regarding the informed consent process, institutional review boards (IRBs), and the participation of special populations in clinical trials, such as children and those with mental disabilities.

The OHRP has temporarily suspended research activities at several institutions in the last few years, including those in some major research centers, until system flaws were corrected.

The OHRP also educates research centers and individuals to help them comply with established clinical trials standards.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA): The FDA has the final say about whether or not a new treatment can be marketed to the public; that is, whether or not doctors can begin prescribing it to their patients. Once all phases of clinical trials on a new treatment are completed, the FDA reviews the information and decides if it is safe and effective enough to be approved.

But the FDA’s role in many clinical trials begins long before this. Any sponsor seeking approval for a new treatment must submit all study protocols to the FDA before the clinical trials are allowed to proceed. Researchers who will be involved in the study must submit their credentials for review as well.

The FDA also inspects (audits) sites conducting clinical trials, especially if there is reason to think that proper procedures are not being followed. If serious problems are found, the FDA can forbid a particular site or doctor from doing any further research.

The authority of the FDA is not absolute, however. Clinical trials that study treatments already on the market are not subject to the same FDA regulations (although many are still done in a similar manner). And substances considered to be "dietary supplements" do not need FDA approval to be sold in the first place. Dietary supplement makers aren’t required to prove that their products are safe or effective. Therefore, they usually do not bother with the expense of conducting clinical trials. A relatively small number of clinical trials are done to study the effectiveness of dietary supplements; most of these are funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

National Cancer Institute (NCI): The National Cancer Institute, part of the NIH, sponsors many of the cancer clinical trials going on at any one time, including those being conducted by cooperative groups. Proposals for such studies must be approved by the NCI before funding is granted. The NCI also inspects (audits) each site involved in NCI-sponsored research at least once every 3 years.

Return to Top of Page


What’s Out There? Finding Clinical Trials

People find out about clinical trials in different ways. Most people who enter clinical trials do so after hearing about them from their doctor. Many cancer patients actively look for clinical trials on the Internet or in other places, hoping to find more options for treatment. Some clinical trials are advertised directly to patients.

If you already have a particular clinical trial in mind, you may want to go to the next section ("How Do I Figure Out Which Study Is for Me?") to learn what you should know about the study.

Types of Clinical Trial Information

At this time there is no single place to get information on all of the cancer clinical trials now enrolling patients. But there are several resources you should be aware of. These resources can be divided into2 main types -- clinical trials lists and clinical trials matching services.

Clinical Trials Lists

These sources can provide the names and descriptions of clinical trials of new treatments. If there is a particular study you are interested in, you will probably be able to find it in a list. It will often include a description of the study, the criteria for which patients are eligible, and whom to contact. If you (or your health care providers) are willing and able to read through descriptions of all the studies listed for your cancer type, then a list may be all you need. Some organizations that provide lists can help you narrow the list a little, according to the kind of treatment you are looking for (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation therapy, etc.) and the stage of your cancer.

Clinical Trials Matching Services

Over the past few years, several organizations have developed computer-based systems to match patients with studies they may be eligible for. These organizations generally offer their services online.

Each may differ somewhat in how it works. Some of the services allow you to search for clinical trials without registering at the site. Even if registration is required, they usually assure you that the information will be kept confidential. Either way, you will likely have to enter certain details, such as the type of cancer, the stage of the disease, and any previous treatments you may have had. When provided with this information, these systems can identify clinical trials for which you are likely eligible, and save you the time and effort of reading descriptions of studies that are not relevant to you. Some firms also allow you to subscribe to mailing lists so that you are informed as new studies open up.

While they are usually free to users, the business of most clinical trials matching firms is based on receiving a fee for listing studies or getting a "finder’s fee" from those running the studies when someone enrolls. Because of this, there may be some differences in the way they "rank" or present the studies to you.

How to Choose a Clinical Trials Matching Service

Because different services vary in the way they work, be sure you understand how the service you are looking at operates. Ask the following questions. Note that the answers do not necessarily mean that the service is not worth using:

  • Is there a fee for using the service?
  • Do I have to register to use the service?
  • Does the service keep my information confidential?
  • Where does the service get its list of clinical trials?
  • Does the service rank the studies in any particular order? Is this based on fees they are receiving?
  • Can I contact the service via the Internet or by telephone?

The American Cancer Society's Clinical Trials Matching Service

After reviewing the available matching services, the American Cancer Society chose to work with the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups in an effort to provide a free, confidential, and reliable matching and referral service to patients looking for clinical trials. The Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups is a non-profit service organization formed in 1997 with the goal of assuring access to cancer clinical trials.

ACS offers TrialTracker, the screening tool developed by the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups, to help patients find high quality care in clinical trials most appropriate for their medical needs and personal preferences, while helping researchers study more effective treatments for future patients.

The TrialChecktm database, developed and maintained by the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups, is a comprehensive database that includes cooperative group, National Cancer Institute, and industry trials. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive matching database of cancer clinical trials available.

The clinical trials information provided by the American Cancer Society is not biased in any way by whether the trial is funded by the government or by pharmaceutical or biotechnology firms. It is updated continually, as is the contact information that allows patients to get in touch with the doctors and nurses at cancer centers running each of the studies.

The American Cancer Society provides access to the TrialChecktm system for our constituents through our Web site, http://www.cancer.org (click on "Find a Clinical Trial") and through a toll-free number (1-800-303-5691) at our National Cancer Information Center. For information about the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups and the TrialChecktm suite of products used by the American Cancer Society’s clinical trials matching service, visit http://www.cancertrialshelp.org/patientsCaregivers/patientsCaregivers.jsp.

Other Clinical Trials Lists and Matching Services

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsors most government-funded cancer clinical trials. The NCI maintains a list of active studies (those currently enrolling patients), as well as some privately funded studies, in the Physician Data Query (PDQ) database. You can access the list via their Web site at www.cancer.gov/clinialtrials or by calling 1-800-4-CANCER. You can search the list by the type and stage of cancer, by the type of study (for example, treatment or prevention), or by geographic location.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) maintains an even larger database of clinical trials at www.clinicaltrials.gov, but not all of these are cancer specific.

EmergingMed provides a free and confidential matching and referral service to patients looking for clinical trials at www.emergingmed.com.

CenterWatch (www.centerwatch.com) is a publishing and information services company that maintains a list of both industry-sponsored and government-funded clinical trials for cancer and other diseases.

Major cancer centers (and even some community hospitals and doctors’ offices) usually offer lists on their Web sites of the clinical trials being conducted there. You can find the major cancer centers closest to you on the American Cancer Society Web site at www.cancer.org/docroot/FTC/ftc_0.asp.

Private companies, such as pharmaceutical or biotechnology firms, may list the studies they are sponsoring on their Web sites or offer toll-free numbers to call. Some of these firms also offer matching systems for the studies they sponsor. This can be helpful if you are interested in research on a particular experimental treatment and know the company developing it

Return to Top of Page


How Do I Figure Out Which Study Is for Me?

The study protocol is the written plan for how a clinical trial is to be conducted. It is what is submitted to the FDA and to an institutional review board (IRB) before a new treatment can be studied. A protocol contains the following information:

  • Why the study is being done (including the goals of the study)
  • Information about the treatment being tested, often including results of previous studies
  • The phase of the study and how many people will be enrolled
  • Who is eligible for the study
  • How the treatment is to be given
  • What tests people will have done during the study and how often
  • Other information that will be collected on participants

Actual study protocols can be 100 pages or more in length, and they can be very technical. Because these protocols are not written with patients in mind, making sense of their language is not always easy.

The clinical trials lists available on the Web often include summaries of these protocols, just highlighting some key points. Research team members may have also have protocol summaries or other information about the study they can share with you. Often, the most important parts for patients looking for studies are the eligibility criteria and any information available about the new treatment.

Eligibility Criteria (Inclusion Criteria)

Each clinical trial has certain conditions, or criteria, that patients must meet before they can enter the study. These are necessary to ensure that the study can answer the specific questions it was designed to answer. For cancer clinical trials, these criteria usually have to do with:

  • The type of cancer a person has
  • The stage (extent) of the cancer
  • Previous treatments a person must or must not have had
  • The length of time since a person last received treatment
  • Results of certain lab tests
  • The medicines a person is taking
  • Other medical conditions the person has
  • Any previous history of another cancer
  • A person’s activity level (also known as performance status)

Other factors, such as a person’s age and sex, may also be part of the criteria. There may be other conditions that are more specific to each study, as well.

Advertisements andclinical trails lists may not contain all of a study’s eligibility criteria. If you’ve found a study you think you might qualify for, you can usually contact someone invloved with the study to get a full list of the eligibility criteria.

I Think I’m Eligible. Now What?

Once you’ve found a study that you think you’re eligible for, deciding if it’s the right one for you can still be hard. There may even be more than one that looks promising. Again, learning as much as you can is key.

One option is to talk with someone connected to the study. This could be the principal investigator (PI) -- the doctor in charge of the study -- or a research coordinator. Research coordinators are usually nurses. One of their jobs is to check to see if people meet eligibility criteria before entering a study. They also make sure that the study protocol is followed for each patient. Often they serve as a link between study patients and their doctors.

Both PIs and research coordinators should be able to answer any questions you have about the study. See the section "Should I Think About Taking Part in a Clinical Trial?" for a list of questions you should ask. Although they can give you answers about their particular clinical trial, they are not likely to be helpful in discussing other studies you may be considering. What’s more, they may be biased (even if unintentionally) toward their own study.

If you haven’t already, talk to your own doctor about studies you are looking at. Bring in whatever information you can, so that your doctor can help you judge what might be right for you. While no doctor knows about every clinical trial being done, yours is most familiar with your medical situation and can probably tell you whether the study is worth considering. This discussion can be time consuming, so you may need to make a special appointment to allow him or her enough time to look over the information you provide.

You may also want to get a second opinion from a doctor not connected to the studies you are considering. Doctors who are well known in their fields are usually up on the latest experimental treatments, and they may be able to point to ones that appear more promising.

If you have access to the Internet, you can do some research on your own. Try to find out if the new treatment has been studied before or if it is being studied now in other diseases, as well as if any results are available. If this is hard for you, have someone close to you help or do it for you. People with a medical background may have an easier time sorting through such information.

Finally, talk to friends and family members you trust. While the decision is ultimately yours, their opinions may provide you with insight into things you had not considered.

Return to Top of Page


What About Cost? Will My Insurance Cover It?

This is a crucial question to ask before deciding to take part in a clinical trial. Recent studies have shown that the overall costs of taking part in a clinical trial are not much more than the costs of treatment outside of a study. Still, insurance coverage can vary widely.

When insurers do cover costs related to clinical trials, it is usually only for tests, treatments, or doctor’s visits that would have been part of your treatment plan if you were not taking part in a study. In other words, they are not likely to pay for special tests or treatments you are getting solely because you’re in the study.

The study sponsor (whether it is the government or a pharmaceutical or biotechnology company) usually provides the new treatment at no cost and pays for special testing or extra doctor visits. Some sponsors may pay for more than this; for example, some may offer to compensate for travel time and mileage. It is important to find out what they will pay for before entering the study.

Private Insurers

In the past, insurers were sometimes reluctant to pay for any of the costs related to a clinical trial. Their concern was that they would be paying for treatments that had not been proven to be effective.

In recent years, many (but not all) major insurance providers have volunteered to cover some of the costs of clinical trials. However, they may limit which types of trials they will cover. They are more likely to pay for costs from phase II or III clinical trials, but they generally look at each request on a case-by-case basis.

Medicare

Medicare covers any cancer care normally covered by Medicare when it is part of either 1) a clinical trial for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer; or 2) a clinical trial funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), NCI-Designated Cancer Centers, NCI-Sponsored Clinical Trials Cooperative Groups, or another federal agency that funds cancer research. This care may include the following:

Routine tests, procedures, and doctor visits

  • Services or items that are part of the experimental treatment, such as costs to administer investigational drugs

  • Health care associated with being in a clinical trial, such as a test or a hospitalization due to a side effect or complication

What costs are not covered?

  • Investigational drugs, items, or services that are being tested as part of the clinical trial
  • Items or services used only to collect data for the clinical trial
  • Anything being provided free by the sponsor of the clinical trial
  • Any coinsurance and deductibles

Cancer prevention trials are not currently covered by Medicare. If you are not sure whether your trial meets all of the requirements, discuss these concerns with your doctor or call the Medicare information number (1-800-633-4227). Other trials may be covered, so be sure to ask about any clinical trial before you begin taking part in one that may not be covered.

Laws Regarding Clinical Trials Coverage

In recognizing the importance of clinical trials, many states have passed laws about insurance coverage for research studies. Several more states are now considering legislation. A few states have worked out voluntary agreements with insurance companies to provide clinical trials coverage.

The types of studies and exact coverage required by these laws vary from state to state -- some cover all clinical trials, while others may cover only certain phases of clinical trials. For a list of state clinical trials insurance laws, see our document, "Clinical Trials: State Laws Regarding Insurance Coverage".

The federal government may soon become involved as well. Bills have recently been introduced in both houses of Congress that, if passed, would require insurers to provide coverage for certain clinical trials. This would allow more people to participate.

What You Can Do

If possible, find out what your insurer will cover before you get involved in a clinical trial.

Find out if laws have been passed in your state that require coverage of routine costs of clinical trials. Then gather as much information as you can about the study and contact your insurance provider to find out about coverage. Many providers may not be able to give you a simple "yes" or "no" answer up front, as they may review claims on a case-by-case basis. You may, however, be able to find out if they’ve covered costs for clinical trials similar to yours (or ones that studied the same treatment) in the past.

Have a summary of your study available, and, if possible, any results of previous studies of the treatment. You may need to ask your doctor or the study’s research coordinator for help in gathering this information. If needed, your doctor may be able to further justify to your insurer as to why this study is appropriate for you.

Study sponsors are often eager to recruit eligible patients for their clinical trials, and they may be willing to cover costs if your insurance does not. If needed, ask your doctor or the research coordinator to contact the study sponsor on your behalf.

Return to Top of Page


What Would Taking Part in a Clinical Trial Involve for Me?

Having an idea of what you can expect from taking part in a study can help relieve some of your concerns and make things go more smoothly. The first thing you will need to do is give your informed consent to participate.

Informed Consent

The people running the study are required to get your written, informed consent before you take part in any way (often even before you have any needed tests to see if you are eligible for the study). In the informed consent process, the researchers (doctors or nurses) will explain the details of the study to you and answer all of your questions and concerns.

You are then given a written consent form to sign. While consent forms are not all the same, they should include the following:
  • the reason for the study (what the researchers hope to find out)
  • who is eligible to take part in the study
  • what is known about the new type of treatment
  • the possible risks and benefits of the new treatment (based on what is known so far)
  • alternative treatments that may be an option for you
  • the design of the study (whether it is randomized, double blinded, etc.)
  • how many and what types of tests and doctor’s visits are involved
  • who is responsible for the costs of the clinical trial (tests, doctor’s visits, etc.) and for the costs if you need additional care as a result of the clinical trial
  • a statement about how your identity will be protected
  • a statement about the voluntary nature of the study and your right to leave the study at any time without fear of compromised care
  • contact information if you have further questions
Before you sign the consent form, ask questions. Be sure someone from the research team goes over the form with you in detail. Efforts are made to make consent forms as understandable as possible, but there still may be terms or ideas that are confusing to you. You may want to bring someone along with you to the meeting to make sure all your concerns are addressed.

Be sure you understand what is involved and what is expected of you. You may want to explain what you heard back to your doctor or nurse to make sure you got it right. Recent surveys have shown that while most people are satisfied with the informed consent process, over half do not understand some of the main points on the consent form.

Finally, don’t be rushed into making a decision. Take the consent form home with you if needed. Get opinions from trusted family members and friends. If possible, you may want to get a second opinion from another doctor as well.

Taking Part in the Study

Once you’ve signed the consent form, you are ready to take part in the study. You will most likely need to have blood tests or imaging tests done before you start treatment (if you haven’t had them recently). A full history and physical exam are also usually required. The results are needed beforehand to confirm that you meet the eligibility criteria and to help ensure your safety.

As mentioned earlier, some studies may require you to stay in a hospital for a day or two to get treatment. In other studies the participants are treated much the same way as other patients getting treatment outside of a clinical trial.

You may have tests done more frequently, both to determine how well the treatment is going and to look out for your welfare. You will likely receive more attention as a study participant than you would otherwise. The doctors and nurses may examine you more often and will want to know if you experience any side effects (called "adverse events") while getting treatment.

Because the possible complications may not fully be known, it is very important to let them know about anything out of the ordinary. They can then decide if what you are experiencing is related to the study and if the symptom needs to be treated or your therapy needs to be changed.Your participation in the study may end for any number of reasons:
  • You complete treatment on the study.
  • The treatment does not appear to be working for you.
  • You have serious side effects while in the study.
  • The study itself is stopped early because the treatment either has proven to be effective or has proven to be too harmful in other participants.
  • You decide to leave the study.

Once out of the study, you may still be monitored for a time so that researchers can continue to get an idea of how you are doing.

Some studies allow you to continue to receive the new treatment even after the study ends. This is known as "open enrollment." This option varies among clinical trials, so be sure to ask about it before you begin.

What If I Want to Leave the Study Early?

You will be told several times before you enter the study that your participation is always voluntary. This is an important point. You have the right to leave the study at any time, for any reason. Your doctor will still take care of you to the best of his or her ability.

Regardless of when or why you leave the study, you may be asked if the researchers can follow up with you from time to time to see how you are doing. This may provide them with important information and can also help ensure your safety, even after you leave the study.

Return to Top of Page


What If I’m Not Eligible for a Clinical Trial?

While some people may be too ill or have other problems that exclude them from clinical trials, most people will probably be eligible for some type of study, even if they’ve had several treatments already. Of course, not all studies you are eligible for may be a good fit for you. It’s always important to understand the purpose of the study and to have a realistic idea of the possible risks and benefits for you.

Clinical trials offer the best avenue of access to experimental treatments. Study protocols, which are written based on prior study results, are strictly followed and patients are monitored carefully.

Some people may be interested in a certain treatment that is only available in clinical trials but may not meet the eligibility criteria outlined for the studies. In some of these cases, a person’s doctor may ask the study sponsor if they can get an eligibility waiver or special exception to allow the person into the study, even though he or she does not strictly meet all of the criteria. This decision is usually made by the study’s principal investigator, sometimes in consultation with others involved in the study. If entered, the person is treated according to the study protocol (the same tests, doctor’s visits, follow up, etc.), although the results are not included in the final study results.

In other cases, the studies may have already enrolled enough people and aren’t accepting more participants.

At times, there may be ways to get access to treatments that are in late phase clinical trials but not yet FDA approved. These are usually referred to as "expanded access" or "compassionate use" programs. In recent years the FDA has expanded these programs to allow some patients who urgently need these treatments to be able to get them.

But they are not always easy to get access to. The programs are voluntary on the part of the company making the treatment. They are not required to provide the treatment in these settings, and some companies may decide not to for various reasons (manufacturing issues, excess demand, etc.). Because of the amount of effort and paperwork involved, the process can at times be slow (weeks to months).  

Some of these programs are described below. All require your informed consent, much the same as for any clinical trial.

Treatment Use of an Investigational New Drug (Treatment IND)

In some cases, if a treatment is showing promise in late phase clinical trials, the maker may apply to the FDA for a treatment IND. This is much like setting up a new study, but it is meant mainly as a way for patients with no other options to get early access to the treatment, rather than to help get the treatment FDA approved.

This can sometimes be used when a person would not have met the eligibility criteria for the clinical trials or when the studies are already closed to further enrollment. It requires that the person have a "life-threatening" or "severely debilitating" condition for which there are no other treatment options.

Your doctor would need to get in touch with the treatment manufacturer to see if such a program exists and what would be needed for you to enter it. As with clinical trials, these programs have to have a protocol that meets FDA approval, as well as institutional review board (IRB) approval in many cases.

With a treatment IND, the supplier may or may not charge for the treatment in question. It is important to find out beforehand whether you or your insurance company might be responsible for paying for the treatment.

Single Patient and Emergency Use of an Investigational New Drug (IND)

A single patient IND is used to get access to an unapproved treatment for a single person with a serious condition who is not eligible for a clinical trial. It is similar to a treatment IND in some ways. It does not require that the clinical trial protocol be followed, but it would likely require that your doctor spell out in detail the proposed treatment plan.

To get a single patient IND, your doctor would need to contact the treatment manufacturer to see if they would supply it. He or she would then need to have the proposed treatment protocol approved by the IRB and the FDA before treatment would be allowed to begin.

An emergency IND can be used when there isn’t time to get approval from the IRB. Your doctor would need to contact the manufacturer to see if the treatment is available and then file the needed paperwork with the FDA. While IRB approval is not needed before starting treatment, the IRB would have to be notified of the situation and would have to approve future uses.

Conclusions

Clinical trials can offer benefits for many people during their cancer experience. These may include access to newer or more treatment options, getting more involved medical care, and having a greater sense of control over one’s situation. But by their nature, clinical trials involve some possible risks and downsides as well, and they may not be right for everyone. Your decision on whether to seek or enter a clinical trial should be based on a realistic understanding of these possible risks and benefits.

If you are thinking about entering a clinical trial, there are many groups, including the American Cancer Society, who can help guide you through the experience.


Additional Resources

More Information from Your American Cancer Society

The following information may also be helpful to you. These materials may be ordered from our toll-free number, 1-800-ACS-2345.

Clinical Trials: State Insurance Coverage Laws

National Organizations and Web Sites

In addition to the American Cancer Society, other sources of patient information and support include:

National Cancer Institute
Telephone: 1-800-422-6237 (1-800-4-CANCER)
Internet address: www.cancer.gov

Return to Top of Page


References

Bennett C, Adams J, Knox K, et al. Clinical trials: Are they a good buy? J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:4330-4339.

Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups. Most cancer patients satisfied with clinical trial experience, yet, few aware of opportunity: study shows improved physician-patient communications could increase enrollment in cancer clinical trials [press release]. June 5, 2006. Available at: www.cancertrialshelp.org/press/pressTemplate.jsp?ID=2120&VID=10009. Accessed July 13, 2006.

ECRI: Should I Enter a Clinical Trial? A Patient Reference Guide for Adults with a Serious or Life-Threatening Illness. ECRI; February 2002. Available at www.ecri.org/Patient_Information/Patient_Reference_Guide/prg.pdf . Accessed July 19, 2006.

Food and Drug Administration. Access to unapproved drugs. Available at: www.fda.gov/cder/cancer/access.htm. Accessed July 19, 2006.

Getz K, Borfitz D. Informed Consent: The Consumer’s Guide to the Risks and Benefits of Volunteering for Clinical Trials. Boston, Mass: CenterWatch; 2002.

National Cancer Institute: Learning About Clinical Trials. National Cancer Institute. Available at www.nci.nih.gov/clinicaltrials/learning. Accessed July 19, 2006.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) - Medicines in Developmnt for Cancer. May 2005. Available at www.phrma.org/files/Cancer%20Survey.pdf.  Accessed Jul 12, 2006.


Revised: 08/03/2006


Printer-Friendly Page
Email this Page
Related Tools & Topics
Learn About Cancer  
Treatment Topics and Resources  
Building a Support Network  
Not registered yet?
  Register now or see reasons to register.  
Help |  About ACS |  Employment & Volunteer Opportunities |  Legal & Privacy Information |  ACS Gift Shop |  Press Room
Copyright 2008 © American Cancer Society, Inc.
All content and works posted on this website are owned and
copyrighted by the American Cancer Society, Inc. All rights reserved.