|
Further scientific evidence
points to the ineffectiveness of a so-called cancer miracle cure touted
by Italian physiologist Luigi Di Bella. According to a study published
in Cancer (Vol. 86, No. 10), the therapy, known as Di Bella Multitherapy,
or MDB, does not give any evidence of improving the survival rate of cancer
patients.
According to Dr. Di Bella, MDB is a combination of somatostatin, melatonin,
a suspension of beta carotene, alpha tocopherol, and retinoic acid, bromocriptine,
cyclophosphamide in low doses, vitamin D, and ascorbic acid. Because of
extensive media coverage in Italy of patients treated successfully with
MDB, the Italian Ministry of Health supported studies to determine whether
it is an effective therapy. Eva Buatti, MD, of the epidemiology unit of
the Direzione Santaria Azienda USL, in Florence, Italy, and her colleagues
followed patients who had been treated with MDB from 1971 to 1997.
"Results from this study do not support any evidence of the efficacy
of the anticancer strategy proposed by Dr. Di Bella in terms of the survival
of this historical series of cancer patients," wrote the researchers. "This
result should be considered conclusive as far as the cases examined are
concerned. These, however, represent a large, nonbiased sample of the whole
Di Bella therapeutic experience."
The researchers obtained their information from a database of Italian
cancer registries. There were 3,076 records reviewed in the study. "A matching
with up to four randomly selected cases from the database was attempted
for each MDB patient, with the aim of comparing observed survival with
one of the Italian registries’cancer cases," the researchers wrote.
The study participants were matched according the following criteria:
cancer occurrence in the same site; gender; age within five years for common
cancers, 10 years for less common cancers; period of diagnosis within 1.5
years for common sites, three years for less common sites; and that they
were alive at the first date on which the patient entered MDB therapy.
Of the 314 patients entered into the study, only four had MDB therapy
as their first choice of therapy. Of these, two died in less than 12 months;
one patient with chronic myeloid leukemia died after four years; and one
is still alive after two years of follow-up.
When MDB patients were compared with patients in the database of Italian
cancer registries, five-year survival rates for children with leukemia
and adult cancer patients was significantly lower in the MDB patients than
in the database patients with childhood leukemia, breast carcinoma, and
adult leukemia, and for all cancer patients combined, according to the
researchers. "Twenty-seven MDB patients survived 10 years or longer after
diagnosis. In only three cases was this long survival unexpected," the
researchers wrote. In other words, the MDB treatment did not improve survival.
Dr. DiBella's therapy has been popular for a number of years, despite
being unproven, said Barrie R. Cassileth, PhD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering
Cancer Center and a member of the American Cancer Society’s (ACS) advisory
group on alternative and complementary methods of cancer management, in
an accompanying commentary. "It was an untested product defended with religious
fervor by patients. Anecdotal reports describing miraculous cures, rather
than scientific data, were used to support its value. These characteristics
describe not only Di Bella’s long unstudied cancer treatment, but also
most other 'alternative' cancer methods."
She added that until research proves the value of these "alternative
therapies," they will remain "alternative" and not mainstream or used widely
in hospitals and cancer centers.
ACS News Center stories are provided as a source of cancer-related
news and are not intended to be used as
press releases.
|