Need answers? 1·800·227·2345 | Home | Community | Get Involved | Donate | | Site Index | Search Go Button
The mark, American Cancer Society, is a registered trademark of the American Cancer Society, Inc., and may not be copied, reproduced, transmitted, displayed, performed, distributed, sublicensed, altered, stored for subsequent use or otherwise used in whole or in part in any manner without ACS's prior written consent.
 
My Planner Register | Sign In Sign In


ACS News Center
 
    Medical Updates
    News You Can Use
    Stories of Hope
    ACS Archives
    ACS News Center Staff
   
   
   
    I Want to Help
  You can help in the fight against cancer. Donate and volunteer.
  Learn more
   
Surgery and Radiation Best When Cancer Spreads to Spinal Cord
Combined Treatment Better Than Radiation Alone
Article date: 2005/11/03
patientINFORM

What Is patientINFORM?

Summary: A new study shows that surgery and radiation are better than radiation alone to treat patients whose cancer has spread to the spinal cord. Patients who received the combined treatment were more likely to walk and retain normal bladder function, researchers report in The Lancet.

Why it's important: Each year, more than 20,000 people in the US with advanced cancer have the cancer spread to their spinal cord. This is a devastating problem. Not only does it cause severe back pain, the spinal cord becomes damaged and many patients end up unable to walk or control their urine.

What's already known: In the past, treatment with radiation seemed as effective as surgery. The type of surgery commonly used, called laminectomy, removed the back parts of the spinal bones to get at the cancer. Because post-operative recovery was slow, most doctors recommended radiation instead, since it was equally effective. But in the early 1980s, a new surgery that approached the tumor from the front or side of the spinal cord was developed. This seemed more effective than radiation, but doctors couldn't be certain. This study was done to answer which is better.

How this study was done: Once the diagnosis of cancer spread to the spinal cord was made and patients consented to participate in the study, they were divided by random assignment into 2 groups. Patients in one group were treated only with radiation therapy to the tumor, while patients in the other group underwent surgery. Both treatments were begun within 24 hours. The group receiving surgery then also got radiation that started about 14 days after the surgery.

What was found: Patients who had both surgery and radiation fared better. After treatment, 84% of the patients in the combined therapy group were able to walk compared with 57% in the radiation only group. They also had less pain and were more likely to retain their bladder control. Patients who received the combined therapy didn't have to spend any more time in the hospital than people who got only radiation. They also lived longer (126 days vs. 100 days).

The bottom line: Most patients with cancer that has spread to their spinal cord should receive surgery first, followed by radiation. Radiation alone is less likely to keep them walking and retaining bladder control.

Citation: "Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomized trial." Published in the Aug. 20, 2005, issue of The Lancet, (Vol. 366, No. 9486: 643-648). First author: Roy Patchell, MD, University of Kentucky Medical Center.


ACS News Center stories are provided as a source of cancer-related news and are not intended to be used as press releases.
Printer-Friendly Page
Email this Page
Related Tools & Topics
Bookstore  
Learn About Cancer  
Prevention & Early Detection  
Not registered yet?
  Register now or see reasons to register.  
Help |  About ACS |  Employment & Volunteer Opportunities |  Legal & Privacy Information |  Press Room
Copyright 2010 © American Cancer Society, Inc.
All content and works posted on this website are owned and
copyrighted by the American Cancer Society, Inc. All rights reserved.